Question for Bruce

Bruce

Bible scripture teaches us that the rock is the symbol of strength, stability and the unwavering nature of God.

The prudent man built his house on the rock (Matthew 7 v25) so when the rain comes and the wind blows that house will not fall. A house built on the sand is a house built on human frailty, mainly the love of money above the love of God.

Bruce, the world sees the PBCC as the latter under your leadership and holds you in more disdain than you can muster for the world.

Please cease your hiding in darkened places and acknowledge or deny, yea or nay, whether the PBCC utilise the vile provisions of the Trusts enabled by the NSW Stewards’ Foundation of Christian Brethren Act 1989 to control your flock that underlines that disdain.

A non-answer will clearly be taken as an affirmative.

My question to you is what legislation underpins the wretched property trusts that make no provision for PBCC members once you, in accord with your assumed dual role powers as both Trustee and Church Leader, designate them past members by excommunicating them?

————-

The following is background for an understanding of the unchristianlike trusts of the PBCC:

First of all, trusts require enabling legislation!

The trusts foisted on the PBCC are the antithesis of normal trusts worldwide.

The only legislation in the world known to establish trusts of the base nature described herein is the NSW Stewards’ Foundation of Christian Brethren Act 1989 (the Stewards’ Foundation Act). The PBCC qualifies as a congregation styled after a Christian Assembly for the purpose of this Act.

The Stewards’ Foundation Act has been recognised for sanctioning non-provision for past members of the PBCC assembly by the NSW Attorney General’s Justice and Law Reform Office in correspondence IM21/28595 EAP21/13729.

The Stewards’ Foundation Act incredibly provides for a Trustee (in the PBCC case, Bruce Hales) to replace a PBCC property owner as beneficiary of their own trusts once they cease to be a PBCC member and therefore a trust beneficiary. This loss of beneficiary rights occurs immediately once the person has been excommunicated on the declaration of the Church leader/Trustee, ie yourself.

This is an act of dispossession and for this reason the Stewards’ Foundation Act should never have been enacted.

The NSW Justice and Law Reform Office has recognised the need for a review of the Act, having invited submissions to that effect.

NSW Government policy requires legislation to be reviewed within three to five years after an Act has been passed so the Stewards’ Foundation Act is now thirty years overdue for review.